Q Grab some popcorn and watch a movie! Select a movie of your choice about some kind of an outbreak. This can include a movie about viruses, zombies, aliens, or anything that meets the criteria for an outbreak. Feel free to be creative with your movie selection as long as it relates to public health and you can adequately cover the assignment requirements below. For this course’s signature assignment: • Provide a summary of the selected movie and why it relates to public health • Determine if the public health outbreak stems from a chronic, pandemic, endemic, or epidemic issue • List the agencies involved with the outbreak and determine if there were other agencies that should have been involved (but were not) and why • Explain if there is any health data associated with the outbreak o If no data are mentioned in the movie, determine what would you include if this happened in real life • Detail how the outbreak could be prevented in the future This paper should be two to three pages in length and written in current APA Style, including both a title page and a reference list for all sources used. A minimum of two peer-reviewed sources should be used in addition to the selected movie. See rubric for specific grading criteria. Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time) Points: 200 Rubric PH_100_DE - Week 7 Signature Assignment Rubric: Outbreak! PH_100_DE - Week 7 Signature Assignment Rubric: Outbreak! Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic and Introduction 20 to >17.8 pts Accomplished The introduction to the culminating project is thoroughly and expertly presented with a clear and relevant focus. The central idea is clearly communicated with supporting evidence. The topic and introduction are narrowly and concisely focused, relaying the scope of the assignment. 17.8 to >14.4 pts Satisfactory The introduction to the culminating project is thoroughly presented, but the key point of the assignment may be missing in certain areas. A focus is present but may be unclear. The paper includes a few thought-provoking ideas or unique insights into the topic. The central idea is clearly stated, but may have gaps in development. 14.4 to >11.8 pts Approaches Expectations An introduction to the culminating project is present but lacks focus and connection to the course content. The topic is not narrow enough for the scope of the assignment and does not convey the intention of the assignment. The central idea is incomplete and needs additional development to match the scope of the assignment. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The paper does not demonstrate an understanding of the concepts in the assignment. The introduction to the culminating project lacks any exploration of the subject. The topic is unclear or too broad for the scope of the assignment. 20 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Research and Evidence 70 to >62.3 pts Accomplished Two or more appropriate peer-reviewed sources are integrated throughout the paper. Sources are highly relevant to the topic and add greatly to the development of the research. Detailed, meaningful quotations and/or paraphrases aptly and accurately support the topic. All sources are from credible, scholarly, peer-reviewed materials. All information presented has been published in the last five years. The paper thoroughly and insightfully discusses the type of outbreak and its relation to public health, the agencies involved, associated health data, and future prevention measures. 62.3 to >50.4 pts Satisfactory One or more appropriate peer-reviewed sources are used. Sources are mostly relevant to the topic, but some may be slightly less relevant to the development of the research. All information presented has been published in the last five years. Quotations and/or paraphrases are lacking or do not support several subtopics. The paper mostly discusses the type of outbreak and its relation to public health, the agencies involved, associated health data, and future prevention measures. 50.4 to >41.3 pts Approaches Expectations The paper severely lacks supporting research. One or no appropriate peer-reviewed sources are used. Sources are not relevant to the topic. Sources may not be credible. Some of the information presented has not been published in the last five years. Quotations and/or paraphrases are lacking. The paper may not discuss the type of outbreak and its relation to public health, the agencies involved, associated health data, and future prevention measures. 41.3 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The paper lacks research and credible support. No references are used, or they are highly irrelevant to the research. Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis with limited or no understanding of the type of outbreak and its relation to public health, the agencies involved, associated health data, and future prevention measures. 70 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Cohesiveness 60 to >53.4 pts Accomplished Connections among subtopics and the main topic are clear without being repetitive or redundant. Concluding remarks demonstrate analysis and synthesis of ideas. Writing and integration of source materials are eloquent and skillful. Structure is aligned throughout with transitions that guide readers through a natural progression. Feedback from the instructor is evidently implemented. 53.4 to >43.2 pts Satisfactory Connections among subtopics are missing or forced. The conclusion is unclear or may be somewhat disconnected from the topic. Writing and integration of source materials are awkward or confusing in some places. A logical progression of ideas and transitional devices is utilized. Feedback from the instructor is adequately implemented. 43.2 to >35.4 pts Approaches Expectations Connections among subtopics are missing throughout. The conclusion is disconnected from the topic and introduction. Writing and integration of source materials are awkward or confusing in most places. Topic sentences may be missing, too general, or overly specific. Feedback from the instructor may not be implemented. 35.4 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations There is no connection among subtopics throughout paper. The conclusion is disconnected from the topic so much that it impedes the meaning. Writing and cohesiveness negatively affects the readability of the paper. Feedback from the instructor is not implemented. 60 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Syle 30 to >26.7 pts Accomplished Uses APA Style accurately and consistently to cite sources with only 1–2 errors. Sources are expertly cited and are peer-reviewed, relevant sources. Meets all formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment. 26.7 to >21.6 pts Satisfactory APA Style is used, but there are 3 to 4 citation errors. Sources are somewhat relevant, but may be limited in scholarly nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment. 21.6 to >17.7 pts Approaches Expectations Reflects incomplete knowledge of APA Style with 5–6 errors. Sources are not cited or used with many errors. Sources are not scholarly in nature. Meets most formatting requirements (length and style) of the assignment. 17.7 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Does not use APA Style, or there are pervasive errors throughout the paper. Does not meet assignment formatting requirements (length and style). 30 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics 20 to >17.8 pts Accomplished The writing demonstrates a sophisticated clarity, conciseness, and correctness; includes thorough details and information; and is extremely well organized. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are all correct. There are minimal to no errors. 17.8 to >14.4 pts Satisfactory The writing is accomplished in terms of clarity and conciseness, sufficient details are included, and it is well organized, but it may contain a few errors. Punctuation, spelling, and capitalization are generally correct with not many errors. 14.4 to >11.8 pts Approaches Expectations The writing lacks clarity or conciseness, contains numerous errors, and lacks organization. Errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization detract from the readability of the paper. 11.8 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations The writing is unfocused, rambling, or contains serious errors; lacks detail, relevant data, and information; and is poorly organized. There are many distracting errors in punctuation, spelling, and capitalization. 20 pts Total Points: 200 PreviousNext